Will you choose Asharr or Kujix?
#2
Posted 04 May 2006 - 12:44 PM
Plus, I guess I'm just stubbornly different like that.
#8
Posted 28 May 2006 - 06:24 PM
#10
Posted 03 June 2006 - 06:57 PM
I liked the druids but it was very hard to lvl with them at a low lvl base for me
#11
Posted 05 June 2006 - 11:52 AM
Morrowind... UGH. Kick in the teeth to the masterpiece that was Daggerfall. Haven't played Oblivion, but heard nothing good.... sigh.
Sorry, just had to vent some of my frustration at Bethesda Softworks there.
Back to the Order/Chaos debate...
This is a cool one, because Order and Chaos does not suggest Good/Evil.
Let me illustrate the point with an example:
You are a necromancer who controls the entire world. Every-one is enslaved and in your dominion. Everything is orderly: everyone does what you want or your zombies torture them for a few millenia. You don't want chaos; you like the way it is. This form of order suits you just fine.
You are a slave in that necromancer's mines. You believe in freedom and justice and other "good" things. The only way you can see this happening, is to overthrow the current dictator, to revolt against the system, to overthrow its stability and replace the authoritarian system with a more ad-hoc, free society.
---------
As you can see, order and chaos cannot be attributed to good and evil in such a manner...
To take things one step further, it can be said that the the strict neutrality (where things are neither too orderly (stagnant) nor too chaotic (anarchic)) is envisaged by nothing and nobody; each person seeks to instill upon the world some absolute form of something...
Indeed, if the world was totally stagnantly "good" then could it not be said that some "evil chaos" could be necessary in order to get society to change, to evolve, to grow? In which case, how do you define "good" and how do you define "evil"?
You cannot say "anything which promotes stability is evil" or conversely "anything which promotes stability is good" simply because this is untrue.
--------------------
Whoa, way off track, I hear you say.
Not so.
I see no reason why I couldn't be an Asheroth Necromancer (perhaps DA would have a few words to say about that, but you get the idea), or a Kujix Paladin (freedom and anarchy, my brothers :-)
I would like to see those factions being more in terms of "Do you seek stability, or change?" than "Do you like to club baby seals to death, or do you like the smell of buttercups and daisies?"
Just my rant. The bait is doused in lighter fluid; flame away.
#12
Posted 05 June 2006 - 10:02 PM
#13
Posted 14 June 2006 - 05:33 AM
Firstly...
Morrowind... UGH. Kick in the teeth to the masterpiece that was Daggerfall. Haven't played Oblivion, but heard nothing good.... sigh.
Sorry, just had to vent some of my frustration at Bethesda Softworks there.
I've heard nothing but good about bethesda and all its games
#14
Posted 10 July 2006 - 11:41 PM
#17
Posted 10 August 2006 - 03:32 PM
#18
Posted 11 August 2006 - 04:33 AM
Yeah I get that. I love the "dark" side, I also like the idea of choosing what the majority don't choose, so the Kujix appeals to me almost automatically.ok heres how i see it... anyone who always goes with the "hero" when playing games seeks the glory or attention they cannot or are to shy to go out and obtain themselves in reality. they strive to be noticed and being a hero in some fictional game is the only way they can achieve that burning desire to be the hero and save the day or do something great or be that perfect special person... i go with kujix dark magic just kicks a**
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












