Yes Ma'am!
#1
Posted 20 July 2008 - 01:53 PM
So would the community like to see this, and if so how would you implement it? Or would you simply prefer a faction-based scoring system to set out what favorable merchants and quest-givers you could use? Let us know!
#2
Posted 22 July 2008 - 01:04 AM
Whether that is through the old faction style, or something as simple as completing a particular quest I'm sure there are many ways to do it but I think faction plays a big part in roleplaying games.
I'm not too sure about a stat or ability (discounting illusions from EQ1) that would give better faction but I have yet to play a game that takes these things into account (except maybe Oblivion which i didn't like at all).
Family - Mitthrawnurodo (Talrok)
#3
Posted 22 July 2008 - 01:14 AM
Maybe I should sayI'm not too sure about a stat or ability (discounting illusions from EQ1) that would give better faction but I have yet to play a game that takes these things into account (except maybe Oblivion which i didn't like at all).
EQ1 allowed you to change faction with people through illusions, but this left these benefits available to only Enchanters and Druids. Druids could change into a wolf which gave them Beta Neutral faction which generally meant noone liked them but noone hated them either, made it really handy to get into enemy territory. Enchanters had racial illusions so going into a Dark Elf city was made alot easier when looking like a Dark Elf (although religion had it's problems but thats another story).
This I perceived as unfair since those 2 classes had advantages over others that couldn't be replicated by other means and I don't regard this as very balanced (even though I used to play a druid), iirc this has been changed so illusions don't alter faction anymore.
Oblivion which I didn't play for more than a few hows seemed to have some system that I never fully got grips with and frankly played too long ago to remember well, all I know is I didn't like it at all. I think there was a random number calculation in there which I don't think should come up in interaction with others.
I think you should be able to change NPC's view of you but everyone needs to be able to do it equally and without randomness however it gets done.
Family - Mitthrawnurodo (Talrok)
#4
Posted 23 July 2008 - 03:28 AM
EQ1 allowed you to change faction with people through illusions, but this left these benefits available to only Enchanters and Druids. Druids could change into a wolf which gave them Beta Neutral faction which generally meant noone liked them but noone hated them either, made it really handy to get into enemy territory. Enchanters had racial illusions so going into a Dark Elf city was made alot easier when looking like a Dark Elf (although religion had it's problems but thats another story).
That's a gray issue to me. I'm all for distinct classes and abilities - in fact, I think homogenization of classes is a horrible, horrible idea. With that, races should be distinct, and homogenizing them is also a horrible idea.
Back in EQ1, needing an illusion to venture in places was pretty neat - stealthy like, paranoia that a guard would cut you down, etc. Having a druid's wolf form faction not tied to their human faction = half-baked idea that every druid abused (guard killing, etc.).
But how do you balance having special class abilities that you don't undermine by creating insta-clicky items that give the same benefit? Bards got many items that gave them many different illusions. Some of the original items (Guise of the Deceiver) could be clicked from inventory by non-Bards until one certain patch day. Hard to balance, and impossible to appease everyone.
Grimmway
#5
Posted 29 July 2008 - 03:39 PM
#7
Posted 02 October 2009 - 09:46 AM
#8
Posted 02 October 2009 - 12:08 PM
Maybe when a certain level is reached, special quests could open up for that faction or city.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users












